Home Cures Natural Remedies are hosting a series of free online interactive webinar events where we will be offering a variety of tips and advice on managing and overcoming various illnesses and ailments.

We are able to offer a completely holistic view point; using naturopathic principles and techniques we will show you ways to assist you on your journey to becoming as well and as free of illness as possible, back to your natural good health.

Each online event covers a specific area and is interactive enabling you to ask questions and lasts for approximately 1 hour. Entry to each event is free but there are limited spaces available.

For more details see: Home Cures Natural Health Webinars/.

Originally posted 2016-01-19 11:26:46.

For over a year, California’s capital city had been poisoning the public water supply – in secret – with chemicals that are known carcinogens, and that have never been approved for use in the water treatment process. This was the disturbing finding of a recent investigation by local Sacramento news affiliate ABC10 News, which revealed that Sacramento residents were treated as human guinea pigs in a heinous government scandal involving massive human rights abuses.

Between 2013 and 2014, the City of Sacramento began quietly adding a chemical known as aluminum chlorohydrate, or ACH, to the public water supply in a supposed effort to save money on water purification. ACH was introduced as a replacement for ALUM – another chemical that had previously been used to remove larger particulates – because it is said to be cheaper than ALUM.

ACH was never properly safety tested, and in fact was known at the time to cause cancer, miscarriages and birth defects when ingested or inhaled. But city officials decided to add it anyway, which resulted in many local residents developing these and other health problems. Some residents even developed cancer as a result of consuming the contaminated water throughout the course of the year.

It was quickly discovered, however, that ACH isn’t even an effective water treatment method. But rather than remove the chemical altogether, the City of Sacramento took things a step further by adding excess amounts of chlorine in an effort to boost the efficacy of ACH – a move that would later prove to create an even more toxic substance.

“An astonishing failure, the combination of excess chlorine and aluminum chlorohydrate ended up yielding carcinogenic toxins known as ‘DBPs’ — disinfection byproducts,” explains The AntiMedia. “Specifically, these are in the class of chemicals known as THMs, or Trihalomethanes.

Hey, Sacramento: Why don’t you stop poisoning public water with fluoride and save money that way?

If you’re at all familiar with THMs, you may already know that these chemicals are highly toxic and represent a major risk factor for cancer, especially at the levels used in Sacramento water. Even so, city officials continued to use them, harming countless individuals by flooding their bodies and lungs with cancer-causing poisons.

“This community was basically looked at as a laboratory guinea pig, in that they were exposed to violation level trihalomethanes for up to one year without any proper notification whatsoever,” stated Bob Bowcock, a local Sacramento resident who grew up working in the water treatment industry, to ABC10.

Local resident Anna Marie Tomlinson, of Rio Linda, is one such individual who now suffers from a debilitating health condition as a result of consuming Sacramento’s intentionally poisoned water.

“I know [the water] gave me cancer,” she lamented to the media, noting that at least three other people on her block also developed cancer during the same year. “I drank it every day.”

If the City of Sacramento is really concerned about saving money on water purification, a better option would be to immediately cease adding toxic fluoride chemicals to the water supply. Not only are these synthetic and highly corrosive chemicals expensive – costing upwards of several hundreds of thousands of dollars annually – but they’re also a toxic and unnecessary addition to public water.

“How do we allow officials to blindly add chemicals to our water supply?” asks Cassius Methyl of The AntiMedia. “Unfortunately, most of us probably weren’t even aware the first chemical, ALUM, had been added to our drinking water — much less the insane chemical soup that resulted as a byproduct of this reckless experiment.”

Sources for this article include:

TheAntiMedia.org

Originally posted 2015-12-28 11:31:12.

Climate change, a phrase that typically instills fear in society, is being eyed by Arizona State University as something that could be beneficial. Contrary to those who view climate change as only having catastrophic consequences, experts from the university suggest that it is responsible for re-greening parts of the world and changing lives for the better.

Experts from the university engaged in a study that ultimately showed that the West African Sahel, the strip south of the Sahara desert, has been “regreening” ever since droughts in the 1970s and 80s killed more than 100,000 people. They maintain that increased rainfall caused by climate change has led to more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which has spurred more plant growth and community-led farming efforts.

The region is turning around and experiencing a vast change from the drought and deaths that once plagued it. The area is greening, plants are growing, and people are coming together. These changes bring improvements in the physical and emotional well-being of the region’s inhabitants, which can ultimately bolster relationships and reverse poverty levels.

Despite positive outcomes from climate change, fears persist

The journal that published this information, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), states that “…long-term satellite-derived greenness sensitivity to rainfall” was analyzed to better understand “…changing vegetation structure in different regions of the Sahel.”

According to the paper, “Our results show that remotely sensed vegetation greenness…has increased across the Sahel since the droughts of the 1970s and 1980s, consistent with increasing rainfall and earlier analyses.” The report was titled, “On regreening and degradation in Sahelian watersheds.”

Unfortunately, there are some people cling tightly to negative views about change of any kind, and climate change is no different. The alarmist web site DeSmog is one such outlet, and it is said to have jumped on Arizona State University’s Sahel findings. They vehemently stated that, “The greening is unreliable. It is thus hardly an encouraging example of a ‘positive impact’ from global warming.”

Perhaps in anticipation of naysayer attitudes like that of DeSmog, the PNAS paper states:

Meanwhile, in the popular press and often in the environmental and development literature, the reports of recovery are sometimes forgotten to the extent that popular opinion in the West – and indeed very often in Africa – holds fast to pessimistic images of overgrazing, degradation, sand storms, and sand-dunes “marching” south from the Sahara towards the sea. The differences in perception of recent changes highlight the need to quantify the extent of recovery (or otherwise) in Sahelian systems since the droughts of the 1970s and 1980s and the extent to which vegetation changes in the Sahel respond proportionally to climate variations.

Embrace change rather than resist it

Without a doubt, climate change is occurring.

In fact, at a 2014 World Meteorological Organization (WMO) conference attended by about 1,000 climate experts in Canada, there was much talk of significant climate changes that could be experienced by 2050. Gigantic waves, increased in-flight air turbulence, flash flooding, dramatic temperature surges, and superstorms are expected to become more commonplace. We’ve seen it already; areas that haven’t seen snow in many years – if ever – have suddenly been blanketed by it. Other regions are dealing with extreme cold or heat. The changes continue, and we must learn to change along with them.

Rather than adopting a fearful attitude, it might be best for society to focus on moving forward. Perhaps making an effort to work smarter and in tandem with climate changes instead of resisting them would improve life on the planet.

Sources for this article include:

Breitbart.com

PNAS.org[PDF]

Blogs.NaturalNews.com

Originally posted 2015-10-18 10:30:14.

It’s happening all around the world, and emerging research suggests that the environmental impact of its use is absolutely devastating: geoengineering, a man-made climate control scheme marked by criss-crossing air sweeps that leave behind streams of shimmering “chemtrail” debris across our skies, is now being linked to widespread drought and famine throughout the world, not to mention the complete breakdown of Earth’s agricultural systems.

Geoengineering expert Dane Wigington of GeoengineeringWatch.org says chemtrail operations represent the “greatest single source of damage on many fronts,” and he might just be right. In some areas of the world, persistent drought conditions brought about by artificial weather manipulation have led to massive reductions in crop output and ever-dwindling fresh water supplies.

In Mongolia, for example, an astounding 80 percent reduction in crop yields is the direct result of persistent drought conditions, suggests Wigington. Similarly, in Thailand, farmers are struggling to produce enough food as water supplies dry up. In some areas, military soldiers are having to protect what little water remains at gunpoint.

A little closer to home, California and many areas of the Pacific Northwest continue to hobble through epic drought conditions that have left many formerly flourishing crop fields completely bone dry. California farmers are reportedly pulling in higher revenues for the crops they’re able to procure, but this is likely due to the fact that supplies continue to dwindle, which, economically speaking, drives food prices higher.

For a more thorough explanation as to how geoengineering and “chemtrails” are affecting precipitation patterns, refer to our earlier piece citing evidence of artificial weather manipulation as a driving factor in the California drought crisis.

Geoengineering isn’t a conspiracy theory; it’s conspiracy FACT

If you’re still of the mindset that geoengineering is some kind of loony conspiracy theory, then you’re not keeping up with the latest science. The United Nations’ (UN) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) openly referred to geoengineering in a 2013 report, noting that stratospheric aerosols are used to produce artificial “clouds” designed to alter weather patterns.

A more recent paper published in the journal Environmental Research Letters examines how geoengineering programs — they’re stated matter-of-factly because it’s now general knowledge that they’re taking place to combat “climate change” — are affecting crop yields. The paper talks about a geoengineering method known as “marine cloud brightening” that was offered up as a solution to climate change nearly 25 years ago.

The paper erroneously concludes that such methods will improve crop yields, but the latest science suggests otherwise. Nevertheless, the paper admits that geoengineering, cloud “brightening,” and other weather manipulation tactics are real. Those of us watching these developments are here to say that they don’t work and are actually making the problem worse.

“A primary stated goal of the geoengineering programs is to provide a ‘solar shield’ to slow ‘runaway climate change’ by spraying tens of millions of tons of highly toxic metal nano particulates (a nanometer is 1/1,000,000,000 of a meter) into the atmosphere from jet aircraft,” reports Wigington.

“The ‘hydrological cycle’ of the planet is being completely disrupted by the geoengineering aerosol saturation of the atmosphere,” he says.

Wigington has been researching the damaging effects of man-made geoengineering programs for years, noting that much of Northern California and the Pacific Northwest is now polluted with particulates of aluminum, barium, and other toxic metals as a direct result of chemtrail spraying throughout the region. These chemicals are not only damaging soils by acidifying them, but they’re also affecting the quality of water, food and air.

Sources for this article include:

GeoengineeringWatch.org

MBTMag.com

NaturalNews.com

ScientificAmerican.com

IOPScience.IOP.org

Originally posted 2015-10-01 10:21:47.

electromagnetic pollutionSince the 1930s, scientists have been concerned about the health risks associated with electromagnetic fields (EMFs). These electromagnetic frequencies can cause dizziness, headaches, blood sugar imbalances, anxiety and, even, cancer. In fact, is was Samuel Milham, MD, MPH — author of Dirty Electricity — who first alerted the world to the frightening links between occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic pollution and human disease.

Are you suffering with chronic disease? Obviously, a healthy diet and lifestyle are essential to reversing disease symptoms and completely healing the body. But, often overlooked in our immediate environment, the fact remains — wireless technology poses one of the biggest threats to human health. If you’re looking to resolve “unexplainable” health issues, don’t miss the next Natural News Talk Hour with Mike Adams and Jonathan Landsman.

Visit NaturalHealth365.com and enter your email address for show details + FREE gifts!

Microwave (cell phone) radiation has been used as a secret weapon against humanity
This is not a joke. Dr. Barrie Trower, a former Royal Navy microwave weapons expert, reveals that there are 8,300 military papers proving that microwave frequencies — which can be found emanating from wireless mobile devices — cause severe neurological and physiological damage. In fact, from 1953 to 1975, a once-secret experiment bathed U.S. embassy employees (and their children) in Moscow with beams of low-level microwave radiation — which caused an unusually high number of breast cancers, childhood leukemia and many other forms of cancer.

Keep in mind, the intensity of these microwave frequencies were similar to what we’re being exposed to with cell towers, microwave ovens, cell phones, Wi-Fi “hot spots,” wireless baby monitors and other mobile devices. And, although it’s hard to imagine, the American government knew about the dangers of microwave radiation and choose to keep it a secret — while they developed their own microwave weapons.

Today, operating above the law, we now know that government agencies can cause chronic fatigue, depression, suicidal tendencies plus a wide range of psychological and physical disorders by directing concentrated beams of microwave energy on “undesirables,” like government protestors. To learn more about how to protect your health — join Mike Adams and Jonathan Landsman for an informative program about the dangers of EMF pollution.

‘Smart’ meters represent one of the greatest threats to humanity
Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, PhD, founder of Klinghardt Academy, links the ever-increasing exposure to electromagnetic radiation (EMR) with the rapid rise in neurological illnesses like low-level depression, insomnia, chronic fatigue, numbness, tingling and “unexplainable” muscle aches and pains. In fact, Dr. Klinghardt believes that “smart” meters — which are being forced on homeowners as a way to “save energy” (yeah right) — are “the worst invention that we’ve followed in the last 2 years with absolutely devastating consequences.”

Simply put, if your local utility company wants to put a smart meter on your home, I urge you to refuse it (you have rights). To learn more about this particular topic, watch Take Back Your Power — an amazing documentary highlighting the health, privacy and security issues surrounding smart meters plus ways to protect your health.

Just to be clear, in the past 80 years, over 6,000 scientific papers have been published which show that electromagnetic fields — like those coming from smart meters — cause biological changes in human physiology. One notable study, from the University of Athens, showed that 143 proteins in the brain were altered, after exposure to mobile and cordless phone devices, including proteins linked to Alzheimer’s, brain tumors, stress and metabolic disorders.

Lead study author Adamantia Fragopoulou, MSc, PhD, said, “this study is anticipated to throw light in the understanding of such health effects like headaches, dizziness, sleep disorders, memory disorders, brain tumors, all of them related, to the function of the altered brain proteins.” To learn more about the science and dangers surrounding EMF pollution — read the “BioInitiative 2012 Report,” prepared by 29 authors from ten countries, ten holding medical degrees (MDs), 21 PhDs, and three MsC, MA or MPHs.

On the next Natural News Talk Hour, Mike Adams and Jonathan Landsman issue one of the biggest health alerts of the year. Don’t miss this program filled with lifesaving information and solutions.

This week’s guest: Mike Adams, editor of NaturalNews.com

Learn about the dangers of EMF pollution and how to protect your health – Sun. Nov. 16

Mike Adams, the “Health Ranger,” is an outspoken consumer health advocate, award-winning investigative journalist, internet activist and science lab director. He is the founder and editor of NaturalNews.com, the internet’s most-trafficked natural health news website and creator of CounterThink.com, FoodInvestigations.com, HealingFoodReference.com, HonestFoodGuide.org and several other websites covering natural health topics.

Adams is a prolific writer and has been called “the best health and natural products writer on the scene today.” (by Ronnie Cummins, founder, Organic Consumers Association) He has received accolades and testimonials from several key influencers in the natural health space, including Dr. Michael T. Murray and raw food pioneer David Wolfe.

Warning: Cell phones can trigger cancer cell growth. On May 31, 2011, the International Agency for Cancer Research — with the help of 31 world-class scientists from 14 countries — “classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).” By the way, “Group 2B” carcinogenic agents also include DDT and lead. On the next Natural News Talk Hour, Mike Adams and Jonathan Landsman talk about the dangers of EMF pollution and real solutions.

Article Source: Electromagnetic Pollution

Originally posted 2014-11-18 11:52:20.